From 8d424a9c8a6fab5039414834c6e34151c577e7da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: P. J. McDermott <pjm@nac.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 11:22:26 -0400
Subject: Add patch to fix handling of empty awk functions.

---
(limited to 'patches')

diff --git a/patches/02_awk-fix-handling-of-functions-with-empty-body.patch b/patches/02_awk-fix-handling-of-functions-with-empty-body.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..102e128
--- /dev/null
+++ b/patches/02_awk-fix-handling-of-functions-with-empty-body.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
+Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:01:05 +0000
+Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:29:20 +0000
+Origin: upstream, http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=b79a0fef
+Origin: upstream, http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=a060a1ad
+Subject: awk: Fix handling of functions with empty body
+
+This fixes the following error that occurs when building an unpatched GCC 4.7
+with BusyBox awk:
+
+    awk: [...]/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtin-types.awk:164: Call to undefined function
+
+BusyBox awk throws this syntax error if the called function has no nodes in its
+node chain (i.e. the function body is empty).
+
+---
+diff --git a/editors/awk.c b/editors/awk.c
+index 3224788..77784df 100644
+--- a/editors/awk.c
++++ b/editors/awk.c
+@@ -2661,7 +2661,8 @@ static var *evaluate(node *op, var *res)
+ 			var *vbeg, *v;
+ 			const char *sv_progname;
+ 
+-			if (!op->r.f->body.first)
++			/* The body might be empty, still has to eval the args */
++			if (!op->r.n->info && !op->r.f->body.first)
+ 				syntax_error(EMSG_UNDEF_FUNC);
+ 
+ 			vbeg = v = nvalloc(op->r.f->nargs + 1);
+diff --git a/testsuite/awk.tests b/testsuite/awk.tests
+index f9c3b6b..6af6072 100755
+--- a/testsuite/awk.tests
++++ b/testsuite/awk.tests
+@@ -25,6 +25,53 @@ testing "awk if string == "    "awk 'BEGIN{if(\"a\"==\"ab\") print \"bar\"}'" ""
+ 
+ # 4294967295 = 0xffffffff
+ testing "awk bitwise op"  "awk '{ print or(4294967295,1) }'" "4.29497e+09\n" "" "\n"
++
++# we were testing for a non-empty body when deciding if a function was
++# defined or not. The testcase below caused:
++# awk: cmd. line:8: Call to undefined function
++prg='
++function empty_fun(count) {
++  # empty
++}
++END {
++  i=1
++  print "L" i "\n"
++  empty_fun(i + i + ++i)
++  print "L" i "\n"
++}'
++testing "awk handles empty function f(arg){}" \
++	"awk '$prg'" \
++	"L1\n\nL2\n\n" \
++	"" ""
++
++prg='
++function outer_fun() {
++  return 1
++}
++END {
++  i=1
++  print "L" i "\n"
++  i += outer_fun()
++  print "L" i "\n"
++}'
++testing "awk properly handles function from other scope" \
++	"awk '$prg'" \
++	"L1\n\nL2\n\n" \
++	"" ""
++
++prg='
++END {
++  i=1
++  print "L" i "\n"
++  i + trigger_error_fun()
++  print "L" i "\n"
++}'
++testing "awk properly handles undefined function" \
++	"awk '$prg' 2>&1" \
++	"L1\n\nawk: cmd. line:5: Call to undefined function\n" \
++	"" ""
++
++
+ optional DESKTOP
+ testing "awk hex const 1" "awk '{ print or(0xffffffff,1) }'" "4.29497e+09\n" "" "\n"
+ testing "awk hex const 2" "awk '{ print or(0x80000000,1) }'" "2.14748e+09\n" "" "\n"
--
cgit v0.9.1