Thanks to Krzysztof Kotlenga <pocek@users.sf.net>:

 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:

> Anyway, appending the 0 byte is no good as tar_entry->name[100] is
> already out of bounds.

http://tiny.cc/964UD looks good enough. It's interesting that we have
to trace bugs already fixed upstream years ago.

http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2009-March/008510.html

git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@203 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions