| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Propagate gz_open() errors to caller function.
This is not enough, it is still needed to check deb_extract return value
everywhere in libopkg/pkg_extract.c
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite@studenti.unina.it>
git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@205 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> Anyway, appending the 0 byte is no good as tar_entry->name[100] is
> already out of bounds.
http://tiny.cc/964UD looks good enough. It's interesting that we have
to trace bugs already fixed upstream years ago.
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2009-March/008510.html
git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@203 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Frans Meulenbroeks
http://groups.google.com/group/opkg-devel/browse_thread/thread/23c3557277de0f2e
If a file name in a tar archive is exactly 100 bytes long the name
field is completely filled and there is no terminating null byte;
so extraction of the file will yield a name that is extended with the
mode (e.g. 000644).
The attached patch cures it although there might be better solutions.
The problem is also in busybox tar and reported there too.
Frans.
git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@201 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Waiting for the patch fixing bugs.
git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@192 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
----------
This patchset updates the libbb stuff to use a vfork() version of
gz_open, called gzvopen. This is done because a standard fork will
duplicate the entire address space. This will invoke the OOM
(out of memory) killer on small-memory machines, because most often
by the time we unzip any package, we've read the entire package
database into memory already. By using vfork() and immediatly
execing the external gunzip utility, we avoid the need to clone the
entire address space.
Yes, this is actually **LESS** efficient than the original way!
But there is no way to (currently) dodge the OOM killer on a
per-process basis, so the alternatives are to either change the
OOM killer behavior system-wide, or to use this workaround.
Mike Westerhof, Dec 2008
git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@190 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@148 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
running libopkg_test
git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@116 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@85 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@8 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
|
|
|
git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@3 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
|
