From 989e9d3972939e7b8a3b3720d0bcffb1f559b468 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pixdamix@gmail.com <pixdamix@gmail.com@e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:53:28 -0400
Subject: Fix issue-79: Opkg can remove a package even if another still depends on it.

  - The problematic case is described by tests/regress/issue79.py

Signed-off-by: Camille Moncelier <moncelier@devlife.org>

git-svn-id: http://opkg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@625 e8e0d7a0-c8d9-11dd-a880-a1081c7ac358
---
(limited to 'tests/regress/issue79.py')

diff --git a/tests/regress/issue79.py b/tests/regress/issue79.py
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..1d427f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/regress/issue79.py
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+#!/usr/bin/python
+
+import os
+import opk, cfg, opkgcl
+
+opk.regress_init()
+
+o = opk.OpkGroup()
+o.add(Package="a", Version="1.0", Architecture="all", Depends="b", )
+o.add(Package="b", Version="1.0", Architecture="all")
+o.add(Package="c", Version="1.0", Architecture="all", Depends="b")
+o.write_opk()
+o.write_list()
+
+opkgcl.update()
+opkgcl.install("a")
+opkgcl.install("c")
+
+opkgcl.flag_unpacked("a")
+
+o = opk.OpkGroup()
+o.add(Package="a", Version="1.0", Architecture="all", Depends="b", )
+o.add(Package="b", Version="1.0", Architecture="all")
+o.add(Package="c", Version="2.0", Architecture="all")
+o.write_opk()
+o.write_list()
+
+opkgcl.update()
+opkgcl.upgrade("--autoremove")
+
+if not opkgcl.is_installed("b", "1.0"):
+	print("b has been removed even though a still depends on it")
+	exit(False)
--
cgit v0.9.1