From 782a1859e311c027f172a5c1d3cc13cc73f04b91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick McDermott Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 14:08:34 -0400 Subject: dev/pkg/opkg/static: Add "an additional package with" --- diff --git a/dev/pkg/opkg/static.mdwn b/dev/pkg/opkg/static.mdwn index 62c733f..a81e810 100644 --- a/dev/pkg/opkg/static.mdwn +++ b/dev/pkg/opkg/static.mdwn @@ -56,13 +56,13 @@ Option 3 A compromise between options 1 and 2 is to leave the `libopkg.1` and `libopkg.1-dev` binary packages as they are and statically link the `opkg` -executable in the `opkg` package with libopkg, without building an `opkg` -executable that dynamically links against libopkg. This means duplicated code -and some increase in file system usage on any platforms that may someday include -some other libopkg-using application in the future. But it also minimizes file -system usage on platforms where opkg is the only user of libopkg, like option 1, -and balances package archive size between options 1 and 2 (and has the same -package feed index file sizes as option 1). +executable in the `opkg` package with libopkg, without building an additional +package with an `opkg` executable that dynamically links against libopkg. This +means duplicated code and some increase in file system usage on any platforms +that may someday include some other libopkg-using application in the future. +But it also minimizes file system usage on platforms where opkg is the only user +of libopkg, like option 1, and balances package archive size between options 1 +and 2 (and has the same package feed index file sizes as option 1). Conclusion ========== -- cgit v0.9.1