summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/policies/inclusion
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorP. J. McDermott <pjm@nac.net>2012-08-12 16:20:54 (EDT)
committer P. J. McDermott <pjm@nac.net>2012-08-12 16:20:54 (EDT)
commit75f6503ff4f8ee6eca94c26545982129245642f9 (patch)
treeaf8a3b58b7a23b2a21c23c70665461eb780f0ae2 /policies/inclusion
parentc78c2e9a8b0bae8957e1d81367deac053ca92fbc (diff)
Update SIP documents.
* Remove document titles. * Add section IDs to headings. * Use Unicode en dash instead of "--". * Use MarkdownBook's "sectlink" macro.
Diffstat (limited to 'policies/inclusion')
-rw-r--r--policies/inclusion/about.mdwn23
-rw-r--r--policies/inclusion/chapters6
-rw-r--r--policies/inclusion/legal.mdwn62
-rw-r--r--policies/inclusion/source.mdwn11
4 files changed, 49 insertions, 53 deletions
diff --git a/policies/inclusion/about.mdwn b/policies/inclusion/about.mdwn
index 0b568f4..08d4600 100644
--- a/policies/inclusion/about.mdwn
+++ b/policies/inclusion/about.mdwn
@@ -1,8 +1,5 @@
-Title: About this Manual
-
-
-Scope
-=====
+Scope [scope]
+=============
This manual describes certain legal and technical policy requirements that apply
to all software included in this distribution.
@@ -12,11 +9,11 @@ Nor does it describe any aspects of the operating system as a whole, including
the filesystem hierarchy, system users, file modes, or service scripts.
-Rationale
-=========
+Rationale [rationale]
+=====================
-Legal Distribution
-------------------
+Legal Distribution [legal-distrib]
+----------------------------------
These requirements ensure that each package may be distributed individually or
as part of a complete operating system, with or without charge, by anyone. This
@@ -27,8 +24,8 @@ in part, in their products. It also means that users who receive copies of this
operating system or its packages are legally allowed to redistribute copies of
the software they possess.
-Software Freedom
-----------------
+Software Freedom [sw-freedom]
+-----------------------------
These requirements ensure that users and vendors have certain rights in the
software they use and distribute. Specifically, for each software package in
@@ -40,8 +37,8 @@ For more information on software freedom and the rights of users and
distributors of free, libre, and open-source software, see the [Free Software
Definition][fsd].
-Effective Support
------------------
+Effective Support [support]
+---------------------------
These requirements ensure that distribution maintainers are able to effectively
support the software packages for which they are responsible. Specifically,
diff --git a/policies/inclusion/chapters b/policies/inclusion/chapters
index f1dd581..39307aa 100644
--- a/policies/inclusion/chapters
+++ b/policies/inclusion/chapters
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-about
-legal
-source
+about About this Manual
+legal Legal Terms
+source Source Code
diff --git a/policies/inclusion/legal.mdwn b/policies/inclusion/legal.mdwn
index f563e02..4079f14 100644
--- a/policies/inclusion/legal.mdwn
+++ b/policies/inclusion/legal.mdwn
@@ -1,8 +1,5 @@
-Title: Legal Terms
-
-
-Copyrights and Licensing
-========================
+Copyrights and Licensing [copyrights]
+=====================================
To be included in this distribution, a software package must either be free of
any copyright interests (i.e. exist in the "public domain") or be accompanied by
@@ -15,14 +12,19 @@ A "free" license is one that is classified as free by at least one of the
following resources and is not classified as non-free by any of the following
resources:
- * [Free Software Foundation, Inc.'s License List][]
- * [List of Licenses Approved by the Fedora Project][]
- * [List of Licenses Approved by the Open Source Initiative][]
- * [List of Licenses that Meet the Debian Free Software Guidelines][]
- * [List of Licenses that Meet the Definition of Free Cultural Works][]
+ * Free Software Foundation, Inc.'s License List, as defined in
+ $[sectlink][res-fsf-ll]
+ * List of Licenses Approved by the Fedora Project, as defined in
+ $[sectlink][res-fedora-approved]
+ * List of Licenses Approved by the Open Source Initiative, as defined in
+ $[sectlink][res-osi-approved]
+ * List of Licenses that Meet the Debian Free Software Guidelines, as defined
+ in $[sectlink][res-dfsg-free]
+ * List of Licenses that Meet the Definition of Free Cultural Works, as defined
+ in $[sectlink][res-dfcw-ll]
-These resources and their license classifications are described under [License
-Classification Resources][].
+These resources and their license classifications are described under License
+Classification Resources, $[sectlink][lic-class-res].
Licenses that are not classified in any way by any of the above resources shall
be reviewed individually. Such licenses may be considered "free" under this
@@ -35,13 +37,13 @@ policy provided they meet the requirements of the following definitions:
* The [Definition of Free Cultural Works][dfcw], as maintained by Erik Möller
and Benjamin Mako Hill
-License Classification Examples
--------------------------------
+License Classification Examples [lic-class-ex]
+----------------------------------------------
Version 1.0 of the Artistic License is listed as a license that meets the Debian
Free Software Guidelines. However, Free Software Foundation, Inc. lists the
-license as non-free. At least one resource lists it as non-free, so -- even
-though at least one resource lists it as free -- Artistic License version 1.0 is
+license as non-free. At least one resource lists it as non-free, so – even
+though at least one resource lists it as free – Artistic License version 1.0 is
considered non-free according to this policy.
The Free Art License is categorized as free on Free Software Foundation, Inc.'s
@@ -63,11 +65,11 @@ approved licenses list, and the list of licenses that meet the Debian Free
Software Guidelines.
-License Classification Resources
-================================
+License Classification Resources [lic-class-res]
+================================================
-Free Software Foundation, Inc.'s License List
----------------------------------------------
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.'s License List [res-fsf-ll]
+----------------------------------------------------------
Free Software Foundation, Inc. (FSF) is a non-profit organization incorporated
in the United States of America. The FSF has published a document titled
@@ -89,8 +91,8 @@ under the following categories are considered non-free by this resource:
* Nonfree Documentation Licenses
* Licenses for Works of Opinion and Judgment
-List of Licenses Approved by the Fedora Project
------------------------------------------------
+List of Licenses Approved by the Fedora Project [res-fedora-approved]
+---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Fedora Project is the community that develops the Fedora GNU/Linux
distribution, sponsored by Red Hat, Inc. The Fedora Project maintains a
@@ -114,8 +116,8 @@ under the following categories are considered non-free by this resource:
* Content Licenses, Bad Licenses
* Font Licenses, Bad Licenses
-List of Licenses Approved by the Open Source Initiative
--------------------------------------------------------
+List of Licenses Approved by the Open Source Initiative [res-osi-approved]
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is a non-profit organization incoroporated in
the United States of America. The OSI has published the Open Source Definition,
@@ -126,8 +128,8 @@ label via its License Review Process.
For the purposes of this policy, all licenses listed in the referenced document
are considered free by this resource.
-List of Licenses that Meet the Debian Free Software Guidelines
---------------------------------------------------------------
+List of Licenses that Meet the Debian Free Software Guidelines [res-dfsg-free]
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Debian Project is the community that develops the Debian GNU/Linux
distribution, sponsored by Software in the Public Interest, Inc. (SPI). The
@@ -150,8 +152,8 @@ under the following categories are considered non-free by this resource:
For the avoidance of doubt, the GNU Free Documentation License is considered
free by this resource when it is applied with no invariant sections.
-List of Licenses that Meet the Definition of Free Cultural Works
-----------------------------------------------------------------
+List of Licenses that Meet the Definition of Free Cultural Works [res-dfcw-ll]
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Definition of Free Cultural Works was initiated by Erik Möller and
co-initiated by Benjamin Mako Hill. Along with the definition itself is
@@ -161,8 +163,8 @@ For the purposes of this policy, all licenses listed in the referenced document
are considered free by this resource.
-General Legal Issues
-====================
+General Legal Issues [general-legal-issues]
+===========================================
Software packages the use or distribution of which is unlawful may not be
included in this distribution.
diff --git a/policies/inclusion/source.mdwn b/policies/inclusion/source.mdwn
index 0cc44d2..d2ce35d 100644
--- a/policies/inclusion/source.mdwn
+++ b/policies/inclusion/source.mdwn
@@ -1,8 +1,5 @@
-Title: Source Code
-
-
-Definition of Source Code
-=========================
+Definition of Source Code [defn-source]
+=======================================
The "source code" of a software package is the form that is preferred for making
modifications to it. This form varies with the nature of the software package.
@@ -14,8 +11,8 @@ computer system. It need not include software that is made available in source
code form elsewhere.
-Provision of Source Code
-========================
+Provision of Source Code [source-provision]
+===========================================
To be included in this distribution, every part of a software package must be
available in source code form. The binary packages generated from the